During the 1970s and 80s, I mostly listened to pop and rock music, when even the likes of Captain Beefheart, Henry Cow and Popul Vuh were filed under pop. However far out I went as a listener, though, classical music seemed connected to a dreary sense of uninspiring worthiness that was fixed inside an ideologically suspect status quo, lacking the exhilarating suggestion of new beginnings, a pulsating sense of an exciting, mind-expanding tomorrow. There was something monstrous about it, as if in its world there were lumbering dinosaurs and toothless dragons, refusing to accept they were extinct. Next to Iggy and the Stooges and the Velvets, it sounded frail; next to Buzzcocks and Public Image, it sounded pompous. While I wrote for the NME between 1976 and 1984, interviewing stars from Lou Reed and John Lydon to Sting and Mick Jagger, I didn’t think about classical music – it was from the past, back when the past stayed where it was and wasn’t as easy to access as it is now. I owned hundreds of albums and thousands of singles by the early 1980s, and then replaced them with thousands of CDs, many of them the same rock albums. Now… Read full this story
- Fight of the Century: Five reasons Mayweather-Pacquiao matters
- In a century at Wrigley, innovations abound
- Chris Jericho on 25 years in wrestling, Vince McMahon, state of WWE, more
- The Coen Bros. Game – Baseball Style
- The Vanishing Man
- WRESTLEMANIA Part 3
- Top 20 crossover fighters
- Swing away: The untold story of the first Home Run Derby
- NFL’s greatest teams not to win the Super Bowl: 1-20
- WRESTLEMANIA Part 1
Paul Morley: ‘Pop belongs to the last century. Classical music is more relevant to the future’ have 261 words, post on www.theguardian.com at September 21, 2014. This is cached page on Vietnam Dance. If you want remove this page, please contact us.